On Technology




The most considerable difference between previous generations and those born after the 8o’s, or better still, between 1950 and 2000 is the incredible speed of technology’s improvement and reachability to the world. The internet! Mobile phones, smart phones, androids! The Hubble telescope! This is not nothing and unless other areas of learning being keep up with the speed with which mechanical technology is advancing, they will really lag behind. This is the case with Philosophy, unless it keeps up with the changing times (meaning technology in this case) it could become obsolete. Even though the study of the world and the human being, through ethics, epistemology, metaphysics and all other nice them for branches of thought that Philosophy looks at will never be obsolete in a level of abstract importance, and will always always be necessary for us as humans; there is a danger that the flashing blue light that illuminates our screen will make us forget everything, even what is important, even ourselves.

The American Transcendentalist Philosopher Henry David Thoreau said of technology: “Our inventions are wont to be pretty toys, which distract our attention from serious things. They are but improved means to an unimproved end,… We are in great haste to construct a magnetic telegraph from Maine to Texas; but Maine and Texas, it may be, have nothing important to communicate.” 
 
In a way I think he means that never have we have such good means of communications, yet nothing really worthy to communicate. If he said that about the telegraph, imagine what he would say now! Reading a text message thread of a twitter account. Poor Thoreau!

Now a days we have the means to educate the whole world, to spread news and truth, and instigate real change but guess what? The biggest use we give our technology is sending petty messages to people when we are bored and we invent and manufacture social personas that we are ‘happy with’ but are not who we are or how we really feel.

Do not get me wrong, this is not by any means an attack to technology. The point of this article is to shine light on the fact that although technology is advancing so fast and is becoming more available; our moral, social, intellectual attributes are not advancing at the same rate, or are not being distributed at the same rate, or are taking the back seat to mechanical technology. Our ‘what’ is getting better, but our ‘why’ is lagging behind. Let me give an example, and important one to my eyes. There is a big debate going on at the moment: privacy on the internet.

So it turns out the National Security Agency or NSA has created a program to collect all the data of everything you do on the internet. American citizens and others, of course. The have even built massive infrastructure to store the hardware necessary for all the information to go to. All you have ever looked at or posted on the internet, every conversation you have, everything you have purchased, everything will be known and stored, like a file. Great! Not great. Really, not great. The internet has become like a second collective consciousness for humanity and to my view, no government or agency has any business storing and possessing the very personal life of so many millions of people. Something, along the lines, is not right. We must review the purpose of it and the ethics of it. We must open debates. Here is where Philosophy has a place again. In the midst of a technology wave, we must swim to find our moral ground again.

Technology doesn’t need to be a scary thing. It can be a marvellous thing. It gives us the means to spread art and information to the whole world at incredible speeds! But we must also beware that this speed will end up standardizing knowledge, ethics and aesthetics. The word technology comes from the Greek word techne, which means art, skill or cunning of hand. And logia, which means branch of learning. Technology is a testament to the refinement of our skill, to what we can achieve and become. It is what it is because of the tools and objects that we’ve created with our hands, from our minds. But as the current state of the world tells us, technology will always work better when it is in agreement and balance with nature and the human being, not against it. Technology is for thriving, yet for so long we have also used it for war and destruction.

It is almost a cliché to say that Einstein did not have the intention to kill so many human beings when he split the atom. None the less, this is the use we have given to the discovery of such a brilliant mind. Perhaps when we understand and heal and tackle our self-destructive instinct and our desire to hurt others, maybe then we will use our technology for higher purposes. I’m afraid to say that this change needs to happen as we don’t want our very survival to hang from a string. Just imagine, if the money spent on wars and drones was spent on good infrastructure, education and nutrition! We would catapult a hundred years into the future and have a better chance at exploring space! But for now, it’ll be nice to have a world we can look at and feel proud. 
 
You may now think I’m an idealist (or at best, very impatient for change), but I do believe that technology is not the problem and governments alone are not the problem either. I think part of the problem is that too many generations now, in the developed world, have become too comfortable and we all feel unable to do anything real about it all. Unfortunately, personal technology (which is how I call mobile phones, laptops, etc) seem to accentuate the bubble in which we live our lives. We can burst the bubble and use our technology to connect instead of isolate and distract. How? By remembering what is important and remembering why we built all these things in the first place.

Eliza Veretilo

Want to write for us?

If you would like to submit an article for consideration, please contact thephilosophytakeaway@gmail.com

Search This Blog